Candidate Data DossierPolicy brief series for professional identity records
CDD-2026 Public edition
Prepared for individual review

Policy brief

Candidate Data Dossier

Professional networks do not merely host career profiles. They assemble evidence about identity, opportunity, affiliation, mobility, and intent.

Public copy Scope: four platforms Method: legal risk reading

Core finding. A professional profile becomes a dossier when it is combined with search activity, contact graphs, recruiter filters, private messages, device signals, and inferred career movement. The legal question is not whether a platform stores a resume. The question is who can use the surrounding evidence and on what basis.

Briefing Question

This site reviews four professional networks as if each were a candidate record system. The pages avoid platform marketing language and ask five practical questions: what information is gathered, which audiences can see it, which governance duties apply, what public history creates caution, and which steps reduce exposure while leaving the service usable.

LinkedIn

Large public profile surface, advertiser tooling, recruiter search, enterprise parentage, and broad behavioral context.

Open brief

Blind

Workplace verification and pseudonymous discussion create a distinct tension between speech safety and traceability.

Open brief

Xing

A DACH-focused network where jurisdiction, consent discipline, and narrower market use change the risk profile.

Open brief

Peerlist

A portfolio-oriented service with a smaller surface, but still meaningful identity, project, and verification records.

Open brief

Reading Method

Legal posture

The analysis treats privacy notices, product design, visibility controls, and public incidents as one evidentiary record. The goal is not to rank platforms by popularity, but to identify where a candidate loses bargaining power over personal information.

Practical posture

Most people cannot leave every professional network. Each brief therefore includes harm-reduction steps that preserve hiring utility while trimming unnecessary disclosure.

Risk Register

Issue Why it matters Common control
Career chronology Dates, gaps, schools, and promotions can expose age, salary band, relocation pressure, and seniority. Show only fields that serve a current professional purpose.
Contact graph Connections disclose who can validate you, who can be approached about you, and which communities you occupy. Limit connection visibility and review old contacts.
Intent signals Searches, follows, profile views, and job clicks reveal private plans before the candidate announces them. Use separate browser profiles and turn off public activity where available.
Public permanence Scrapers, archives, screenshots, and exports can outlive platform deletion settings. Assume public fields may be copied outside the service.
  1. This brief is informational and not legal advice.
  2. The term candidate includes job seekers, employees maintaining market visibility, founders, contractors, and students entering the labor market.